The Krishna S Dixit Court of Justice will hear the petitioner for the purpose of examining the interim measures that the gaming companies have requested.
The All India Gaming Federation (AIGF) filed a petition challenging the constitutional validity of the changes to the Karnataka Police Act, 1963. Other gaming companies also asked the court to challenge the law and seek redress. The court will crush the petitions and hear them.
Advocate General Prabhuling Navadgi represented the state government and informed the court that the government will file a statement of objections by Wednesday. Senior lawyer Arvind Datar appeared for the gaming federation.
The petitions called for an interim measure that includes a suspension of the application of recent amendments to the Police Act regarding online gambling, and instructions to the state government not to initiate proceedings under the provisions of the law. the law for the duration of the petition.
The petitioners argued that the Madras High Court recently overturned a similar law that attempted to stop online skill gambling in Tamil Nadu.
ROCKSTARS STARTUP IN 2021
Log in to see our list of the most promising startups of 2021
The government of Karnataka on October 5 notified the law banning betting and betting in online games after Governor Thawar Chand Gehlot gave his consent. The Karnataka legislature adopted amendments to the Karnataka Police Act, 1963 at its recent sitting.
The AIGF said Southern state law had harmed “legitimate online skill gaming companies that have the right to trade.”
The amended Karnataka Police Act prohibits online gambling which is of a “gambling” nature. The law states: “Gambling means and includes online games, involving all forms of betting or betting, including in the form of tokens valued in terms of money paid before or after their issue, or electronic means and virtual currency, electronic funds transfer as part of any game of chance. The law, however, excludes lottery or betting or betting on horse races.
Gaming Instruments, according to law, included any item used or intended for use as a subject or a means of play, including computers, computer system, mobile or Internet application or cyberspace, virtual platform, computer network, computing resource , any communication device, electronic applications, software.
Mumbai-based fantasy gaming platform Dream11 also separately disputed a case after Bengaluru police convicted its founder Harsh Jain and Bhavit Sheth for allegedly running its gaming operations even after the new law was notified. . The firm is pursuing legal action to cancel the FIR against the two co-founders.